Saltar al contenido

Section 375 is not an anti-women or anti-men film. It is a pro-truth film. It argues that the law must remain blind to gender, power, and public opinion. It reminds us that while the majority of rape survivors are truthful, the justice system must be equipped to handle false accusations without dismissing genuine ones. It is a brave, uncomfortable, and essential watch for anyone interested in law, gender politics, or Indian cinema.

Critics praised the film for its taut screenplay and mature handling of a sensitive subject. It was noted for its refusal to provide easy answers, instead leaving the audience to debate the verdict long after the credits roll.

A: No. While the film references real legal cases (like the Nirbhaya case), the story of Rohan Khurana and Anjali Dangle is fictional.

: Delivers a career-best performance as the suave, sharp-tongued defense barrister.

Section 375 boldly addresses a critical issue in Indian society. The film highlights the flaws in the Indian judiciary system and the challenges faced by rape victims while seeking justice. The narrative emphasizes the importance of consent in a relationship and the repercussions of misusing power.